OPEN ANTHROPOLOGY

Entries from May 2008

Daniela Drinks with “Darkie”

May 31, 2008 · 3 Comments

Professor Sigismund Goodfellow, a gentleman anthropologist whom we have already encountered, telephoned me last night and asked, “If you would be so good as to escort a new graduate student entering the field. She is Daniela Rubin, and she arrived from Goldsmiths just last week. I am afraid I am too much, shall we say, ‘under the weather,’ to be of any use. Introduce her to your informants, as she is particularly interested in,” he hiccups, “ethnobotany and shamanism.”

•••••••

I meet Daniela Rubin on a blazingly hot Saturday morning outside of where she is renting a room. She is staying in an antique “gingerbread” house, owned by an elderly couple who are so deaf that they force me to shout, holler, bellow in the street so that the whole place now knows who I am and what I am there for. I am very sensitive about these things, I know how people in this postcolony are always looking and listening and taking notes, on everybody, on strangers perhaps more. Blazingly hot, I said, as it had just rained and now with the sun shining the evaporating rain became like a steam, bristling with biting little flies. After hearing some rustling of papers inside the house, and footsteps on an old wooden floor, out comes this 28 year old woman, olive skinned, long black hair, dressed in heavy brown sandals, khaki green pants, and a canary yellow sleeveless jersey. She walks towards me, limp hand extended, her other arm wrapped around a satchel, and she says, “Hi, I’m Danny.” Danny, a name that’s cute, unlike the lack of any smile on her face.

After performing the usual acrobatics in trying to open the burning hot, dented passenger door, I invite her to enter the oven-on-wheels. I use my sweat rag — I learned from school children to always carry a small hand or face towel to wipe off the litres of sweat I would lose in a day — my soaked sweat rag, to wipe and this way cool down the steering wheel. A buckling start and we lurch forward, past a child with a box on his bike, standing in the gutter, calling out, “Dolla a bodi!” He sees me looking and smiles and says, “white man, yuh na wa na bOdi?” overemphasizing the “O” so his mouth almost raised off his little face. I start to laugh and shake my head, “Next time,” I tell him.

Daniela looked as if her skin had gone into overtime producing a film of sweat and grease, and she fanned herself repeatedly with her agenda. “Is it always this hot?” I tell her that in August it is the worst, and the massive rain really offers little comfort in the end when you have to suffer the steam. I ask her if she knew what “pee wah” was as we pass a pickup truck, with its back panel down, revealing a glowing red and orange mountain of pee wah.

“Oh yes, of course, I have seen it in Guyana. It is of Amazonian origin.”

I ask, “Have you eaten it?”

She shakes her head, and I tell her to try them, they taste vaguely like potatoes, just boil them for about — whatever — until soft to the fork, peel them, and don’t forget to salt the boiling water. “Damn good stuff, man” I say, and she looks straight ahead. I add, “but not as good as tipitambo in my view.”

“Tipi what?” she asks

“Oh, it’s another Amazonian thing there. You possibly know it as Venusia spadafora or whatever.”

Off we go, to find Moses on his Mount.

•••••••

Several dozen potholes later, her mood shifts, as if the knocking about in the hot car, buffeted by a dense breeze, has somehow allowed her mouth to directly broadcast whatever was on her mind. She asks me,

“So you don’t mind my stepping on your turf, I mean, it’s not like I mean to step on your toes or anything, but I wanted to find out if these were real shamans you were taking me to meet, or some of these new age plastic shaman types.”

Now, I don’t know what a “real shaman” is, but that’s not what bothers me…about a high class student from an elite institution where she should know better, that’s not what bothers me at all.

“Step on my what? Wow…Danny…you seem to take this ‘field’ thing too literally.”

“Brilliant.” She did not want any explanation, just a green light. And that “brilliant” would become the start of almost every sentence she would utter that day.

“Hey Danny I am turning right here”

– “Brilliant”

“I think I may sneeze”

– “Brilliant”

“We might even get there in one piece, as long as my engine does not explode…again”

– “Brilliant”

“I think I might have lung cancer, I don’t know, but I have been coughing up lots of blood”

– “Brilliant”

But the whole “turf and toes” idea would not leave me alone as we wound our way up through the hills. Turf…and toes. Terrain. Feet. Stamping and stomping. My property. My estate. It all seemed very “plantation” to me, very appropriate for this “postcolony”. The thought was magnified as we passed the ruins of a famous estate that once belonged to a French count who went mad and who was said to have drunk the blood of several of his slaves.

(On a side note, I am always amazed at how slavery and torture can be beautified in the postcolony. Candy-coloured plantations, where torture of the severest kind has been documented. On the other hand, in the capital city, there are the ruins of a market where slaves were sold, and most local passers-by don’t even know the history of that block of ruins — some think it was a contemporary building, destroyed by a recent fire. I wondered if, out of a similar desire to attract tourists, if Auschwitz came with a gift shop and a cute cafe.)

“So, Danny, tell me something. You think I see these people as my property, part of my personal collection?”

“Brilliant, I always manage to offend the over-sensitive sort. No, what I am saying is, you were here first, you weren’t even supposed to be the one taking me on a tour –”

– “Oh well Dr. Goodfellow’s car is air conditioned, so you really missed out there…” I say with a hint of jealousy.

“No,” her voice becoming more serious, “what I am saying is, these are the people you are studying, and I didn’t mean to intrude, to usurp, are you able to follow?”

“Ok, but maybe they will like you so very much that they will tell me to bugger off. You know, I think they get a choice about who gets to dig around inside their skulls.”

“Brilliant, I love self-righteousness!” She turns away and I can see a faint smile on her face. I think to myself that this is going to be a very long day.

•••••••

“Say, Danny, what have you brought as a gift?”

“A gift? For you?” Apparently the chauffeur is not entitled to one, but I let that go.

“No! I mean for the hosts we will be staying with today. Did you bring a little something?”

“Brilliant, now I have to bribe my way past the door.”

“Oh well, screw it man, now we have to find some kind of shop, we can’t show up empty-handed like some leeching scumbags.”

The way her head snapped around at me showed that she was quite gobsmacked by what, I confess, was too strong and was not meant to be about her alone.

As if an idea suddenly struck her hard, she says, slowly: “Listen, would you mind very much getting a bottle of rum?”

“So we should encourage that now?”

Looking at me as if I had become even more of a turd, she clarifies: “No, but if I have to pay to enter, I might as well get a return on my investment.”

What? Meaning she would get a drink out of it, or what?

•••••••

Toe turf. So there it was, the field is just that, property, you cultivate it, and it’s yours. Can she be blamed? I mean, after all, she was just being careful, and besides it’s part of the unwritten code of anthropology — stay on your own turf. Apparently we are gangsters. But the influence is a biblical one, not so? In that case, it’s not an unwritten code — “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s ass.” She just wanted me to know that she was not coveting my ass, or asses. But it’s not just the Holy Bible. It’s also John Locke — how can I say this fruit tree is mine? Well, if I planted it, and invested the labour, then you can’t just come by and take freely.

“JAH LOVE!” shouts a smiling, semi-toothless, bare-chested young Rasta boy from a yard we pass, with a half-peeled, juicy-looking, big, fat orange in his right hand, and a tiny pocket knife in his left hand. I answer, “Alright brother” and just wave backwards.

•••••••

We get to this ramshackle shop on a bend, and I have to practically skid to stop because I don’t remember anything else on the way to where we’re going. As soon as I enter I get a gentle smile from the owner, an Indian man in his fifties, Radio Ramleela blaring in the background. I rush him. “You have any puncheon?”

“Nah boy, I all outta dat since las’ night.”

“Ok, then lemme get a bottle of Vat 19, a jaliter (2 liter bottle) of Coke, and one of those bottles of salted channa, thanks.” I rush out, and Danny greets me, with “brilliant”, and heat crazed I almost want to strike her on the head with the rum bottle and leave her limp-ass carcass out for the cobos (a French patois derivation of corbeaux, vultures). She doesn’t even offer to bloody share the cost, I mean, come on. Manners! Am I supposed to remind her that she owes me money? Why should she place me in that position?

“Hey so Danny, who is your supervisor, is it Dr. Goodfellow?” I need to know, because someone will owe me big time for this sacrifice I am making.

“Oh no, my supervisor is Danny, you know him.”

“Danny is your supervisor, and you call him Danny, and you call yourself Danny too?”

“He calls me Danny too!” She smiles and winks, like, “we have a little special link, he and I.”

Danny and Danny. Danny too. Danny II. Danny, raised to the power of two. Or, Danny Part Two.

“Ok then, Danny, from now on I will call you Danny2.” She misses the irony, because she can’t see the writing in my head.

•••••••

“What did you mean by ‘real shaman’ a while ago?” I ask her. We only have about 10 minutes left to the drive and I start to worry about whose space I am about to invade with the Goldsmiths Miss Thing at my side.

“No well, what I meant was, you know, you get some types who want to claim they are ‘indigenous’ such and such, and the whole eco-botanical-nature-shaman thing is usually a tool some use to fortify their claim.”

“Ah, yeah, ok Danny, you see that? I would make sure you keep that in your back pocket when you speak to Moses, because if there is one man who can sniff out a sniffer, it’s him.”

“His name is Moses?”

My left hand rests on the stick between our thighs, as I begin to gear down to take the heat off the brakes as I swerve into Moses’ generous green yard.

•••••••

What a pleasure, that cool stable shade, after that rocking hot car. I know to make my way to the thatched meeting house, bypassing Moses’ gallery as I shout, “Hello! Afternoon! You sleeping again man?” laughing. We always accused each other of taking too many siestas during the day, an old joke, forget it.

“Max, I coming down now, you go have a sit.” Moses’ big deep voice calling out from behind thin curtains, what a welcome change.

“You bring some little libation?” he asks me, as if he suddenly remembered to ask.

In the meantime, my favourite music video is blaring from his television set, and how appropriate the message is:


“Whoa, Moses, you can smell it though glass or what?”

“Nah, I just asking if to bring down some ice…jackass” he chuckles.

“Yes, lots of ice please.”

“I coming just now.”

I motion to Daniela to take a seat on a bench, and I go sit at the opposite side of the hut, because I intend to drink and observe and little more. I did my driving and now I need my rest. I watch Daniela polish the exterior of the bottle, placing it exactly in the centre of the little round table in the centre of the hut, and she takes out a micro-thin digital audio recorder, and places it right next to the bottle.

•••••••

Moses, in jeans, a white jersey, and straw hat, shuffles in with a bowl of ice. He catches sight of the audio recorder, and his head cocks back.

“So this is an interview?”

I introduce Daniela to him, and stop at the point where she will need to tell him what her research interests are about.

“I want to learn more about the ritual and pharmacological aspects of native plants in communities such as yours, and how that ties in with identity and issues of power, especially with reference to theories of self-actualization and practices of locality, indigeneity, and contested ideas of healing.”

Moses, sitting on the edge of his hammock, looks at her with a face of stone. The only thing he says is, “uh-huh.”

Daniela fidgets during this intermission, and I see a familiar sparkle coming to Moses’ eyes, followed by a faint smile. He asks, “So how is it that you want me to help you?”

“Well I heard that you say you are a shaman and –”

“That I say that I am a shaman. Uh-huh, go on.”

“So to get started I am trying to develop an inventory of the plants that are most significant to your healing practice.”

“And this is why you brought rum. Is a healing kinda t’ing,” Moses adds, reverting back to local parlance.

Daniela laughs and says, “no, that’s just a present. As I was saying, an inventory…”

“Inventory? Who you work for again? Who you collecting for? You plan to grow these plants on your balcony in cold cold London?”

“No, no, I’m just a student, and the rum is just a gift, I can assure you, it’s just a small way to say thanks.”

Pouring out enough rum to fill her styrofoam cup, Moses says, “and good gifts are the ones you share with friends,” and sprinkling some on the ground, “and with the ancestors.”

Daniela asks, “Max, aren’t you joining us?”

“Well, if you insist. Moses, ‘leh we fire one!’ ” Moses laughs, delighted at how much of the local parlance I want to adopt at any moment.

“So, if I can ask, where does your knowledge of the properties of plants come from,” rushing headlong into what she said was not an interview. It’s as if she had just finished getting her parachute off, picked up her rifle, and hit the field running.

“I get it from the Great Spirit and from dreams!” Moses did not shout this, but he said it with such firmness that it bordered on hostility.

“Drink up,” he tells Daniela. She barely finishes putting down her cup that he fills it back up again, while giving himself a drop or two. She certainly is getting a return on her investment, I thought, and then realized that Moses was making an investment of his own.

In the meantime, I begin to occupy myself with Moses’ underfed black dog, stroking him from his face down to his tail, coating my hands with his thick grease and dust, all the while looking him in the eyes and whispering: “Who’s my sweet, beautiful little agouti dog?” The dog, unaccustomed to such attention, looks up at me stunned, as if asking, “What are you doing?” Moses looks over at me and says, “You will need to wash your hands, he just finish diggin’ by the latrine.” “Digging by the latrine?” I ask the doggy with excitement — “there’s a good little agouti!”

•••••••

“So you don’t learn about the plants from family or other shamans,” Daniela continues.

“No, I learn about them from talking to animals too.” Moses smiles.

“So the knowledge wasn’t passed down to you then.”

“Well, listen,” Moses says rising to his feet and taking a few paces toward her. “I wouldn’t pass on all my knowledge to my own son, because some you learn special, and some medicine you get from dreams.”

She smiles in a way that could have been read as, “this is bullshit.” Moses puts his hand out and tells her, on his feet, taking a few steps towards her:

“One day a man come to me with prostate problem, he say he can’t pee, how I could help. All night I toss and turn in bed, and then I get a dream. I see a little brown bottle with this word on it: A.B.R.A.C. A voice tell me to give the man a teaspoon of that and his cancer go melt. So next day I go by the pharmacy and I ask for A.B.R.A.C. They look through some big books and them can’t find it, saying it don’t exist. So I start to walk home. I reach a lonely intersection, nobody around, and I hear something — tink, tink, tink, on the ground. A tiny brown bottle roll up to my shoe from nowhere. I pick it up and it say A.B.R.A.C. on the label. When the sick man come, I give him a teaspoon and I tell he: now go take a pee in these beer bottles. He fill up nine bottles without stopping, and he pee black, black like coal he peeing. Swelling gone. No more cancer. Next day I go look for the medicine bottle, and it gone.”

Daniela is silent. She glances at me as if she wants to go, and I pretend not to understand. I thoroughly enjoyed Moses’ story.

“Well, I won’t be finding any A.B.R.A.C. around I’m sure,” Daniela says, “but I was hoping you would know something about the plants used in your community.”

Daniela sees a bush behind Moses, recognizes it, and jumps up to take a leaf. She exclaims, happy, “oh I know this one, this is” the Latin name was unintelligible, “and I learned of its uses when I spent time in the Amazon.”

“And what you call that?” Moses asked, his eyebrows furrowed.

She repeats the Latin name, Neurolaena lobata and talks about the uses of the herb. Moses says, “Well I don’t know about that, but we here does call it Zebapique and it good for diabetes,” whereas Daniela said it was used to treat menstrual pains. She got a doubtful look on her face as she looked at Moses, and he returned it.

They had several such exchanges, touring the yard, picking leaves off various plants, Moses explaining only one particular use for each one (good for cold, good for stomach ache, good for rheumatism), but not how to prepare it, and each time Daniela would correct Moses about any given plant’s uses, saying, “um, not in my book, no.”

Wandering around on my own, I gather black seeds from a plant in my palm. Moses, glancing sideways, and then freezing, says, “No, Max, you would not want to put those in your mouth.”

“Oh no, and why not, dear sir?” I ask, as usual sparring with Moses for fun. “I just may do so.”

“That is datura boy, and the dose you does be thinking of taking is good enough to give a big fat white man like you a big fat white heart attack, and I don’t want to have to be toting your big fat white self up by hospital 60 miles away.” We both laugh loudly.

“Oh so this is datura then. That is native to here?”

“No, East Indians bring it.”

“No there is one native to Mexico, if I am not mistaken,” Daniela interjects.

Moses asks Daniela:

“You know the name of the plant that can take away a person’s voice?”

“Take away a person’s voice, as such? No I don’t believe I ever heard that one before,” Daniela asserts.

“I know, I’m just teasing. Listen, try this leaf, nah, we call it Callaboca mint, it sweet and leave your breath nice. Try it.”

She places the leaf on her tongue, timidly, looking up at him. After a few moments…nothing happens.

Moses asks her again, softly and deliberately, “so, really, you never hear of plant that can make a man go silent?”

Daniela smiles and begins to open her mouth when suddenly she claps her hand to her throat. Her mouth swells up like a balloon. It bursts open, letting out what must have been a kettle’s worth of watery spit, splashing onto her sandals, making mud out of the dry dirt around her feet. Moses says, “Sorry, what is that you be saying? I cyah hear.”

Still spitting, Daniela sticks out a tongue that has swollen, looking like a small, red fist more than a tongue.

“Right, no voice. Case closed. Go drink a ‘cokes’ to cool it down.” Moses had just introduced her to Dumb Cane.

Daniela would spend the next three hours wearing thin on my nerves, drinking, talking excitedly with her new found master, and getting drunk to the point that she slipped down onto her knees at one point. Moses’ plan was working.

A great song wafts in from Moses’ radio back in his mud-walled home, it’s “Rum Till I Die” by Adesh Samaroo:

On and on she went about her ex-boyfriend; about how ugly her supervisor’s wife is and how she distrusts Daniela for always coming by their home; about how her supervisor could do much better in terms of a female mate; about how bad she needs to get this Ph.D.; about how she is much smarter than any of the other doctoral students; about how she worries that she won’t get the information that she needs; about how local people stare at her too much when she goes walking by; about her fear that someone could mug her or worse; and, about how she knows many black people in London but none as friends. Moses, lying back in his hammock strung to one side of the hut, just nods and smiles throughout, taking his own mental notes. As the day had grown hotter, he had his jersey off, revealing the tattoo of a crab on his left breast. When Daniela spoke, she did so often while eying that crab.

Daniela was thrashed by rum. As we got up to leave, she stumbled, and then staggered out after me as we left in the dark. The whole time we made our way to the car she kept calling out to Moses, too loudly, “Bye! Bye! Bye! Bye! Bye! Bye!”

•••••••

I start the engine, we turn around in the road, hands waving out the window to Moses’ silhouette, standing in his driveway, with an aura created by a lone exposed light bulb on the exterior of his home, a few moths swirling around it.

As we get to the end of the road, Daniela says: “That is one clever darkie.”

I said nothing, but I was so surprised that my foot came off the accelerator and we began to slow down.

Daniela adds: “And one strapping man too, if I say so myself. Who is that woman in the background, a care taker?”

“No, that’s his wife.”

“Hmm.” Daniela’s final thought before she passes out, leaving me in blessed dark silence for the drive back to town. I assume Daniela will not be in condition to type up her “field notes” tonight.

Categories: "FICTION" · COLONIALISM/IMPERIALISM · ETHNOGRAPHY
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Four New Tribes Discovered: 3 in the USA, 1 in Iraq

May 30, 2008 · 1 Comment

New tribes are being discovered everywhere, and not even the United States is exempt. By a recent count, at least three new tribes have been discovered on the American mainland, while American occupiers have stumbled upon a new tribe in Iraq, one that persisted right under their noses, to the shock of many observers.

Two of the new tribes have been discovered in Florida and Michigan. There had previously been suggestions that such tribes, consisting of allegedly “disenfranchised” voters did not exist and thus could not be counted. But by a bizarre turn of events, bus loads of these uncounted self-counting voters will be put on display tomorrow at a special ethnographic exhibition being mounted by Senator Hillary Clinton at the Democratic National Committee. And what a sight it should prove to be. Anthropologists are bound to swarm the venue with their single lens reflex cameras, hoping to get prize shots of these previously irrelevant rule breakers. Even Clinton herself had claimed they should not be counted, but she changed her mind suddenly in recent weeks, and took pains to indicate their homogeneous cultural traits: they are predominantly white — hard working whites — they are angry, and their women are especially angry having been exposed very recently to the modern reality of “sexism.” These two tribes promise to put on a colourful show. Having been passed over once before, they intend to wear their special war colours and wave colourful placards with exotic scribblings of “Hillary 2008,” as a show of deference to their new found Great White Chief. Event organizers are warning the public not to feed the members of these tribes with their bare hands, and to avoid direct eye contact. Children are best kept away in case enraged members of these warrior tribes begin to stampede at the end of the day.

A third new tribe has been discovered by the mass media itself, in the U.S. This tribe consists of the majority of Jewish American voters who will not be voting for John McCain in November. Yet thousands of articles have been and will continue to be written claiming that Barak Obama has a “problem” with Jews. Here are some of the newly discovered cultural traits of these previously unrecognized Jews, a veritable Lost Tribe of Israel:

Take a look at the latest survey of American Jews undertaken by the American Jewish Committee last year. Among the findings: 67 percent of American Jews believe it was wrong to invade Iraq; 57 percent oppose the US taking military action to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons; a plurality favor the establishment of a Palestinian state; Jews are four times as likely to be registered Democrats as Republicans–and label themselves “liberal” over “conservative” by almost 2 to 1.

Yet head to the latest AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) conference and you’re unlikely to hear these progressive views echoed. To paraphrase Richard Nixon, it’s almost like American Jews have become a silent majority in their own community.

And now a fourth new tribe has hit the news, this time in Iraq. The members of this tribe consist of Sunnis and Shia who are peaceful in the face of U.S. military uniforms. Anthropologists such as Senator John McCain have made the remarkable discovery that the more U.S. military uniforms are in evidence in Iraq, the quieter these two groups become. The escalation of violence recently has not disturbed their theories. Moreover, contrary evidence that U.S. forces cannot take credit for temporary cease fires worked out between local contending parties, has also been dismissed as pointy-headed nay-saying by surrender monkeys. We will continue to cover this story for further developments.

UPDATE! I just received word from my colleague, and superdelegate, Wappiamouth, that new photos of a previously undiscovered tribe in the Amazon — yes, in the Amazon of all places — have just been released on her site by the BBC.

Categories: "FICTION" · "OUT THERE"
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

More Publications on Anthropology & Counterinsurgency

May 30, 2008 · 4 Comments

Perhaps it would be best if I avoided any more discussion of the work of anthropologists in counterinsurgency programs, especially when I see opening lines like this one: “To wage war, become an anthropologist.” (First, let me thank Culture Matters for pointing me to an article which then pointed me to more.) The reason I say that is that I am not keen about either domination or resistance, about either passive or active opposition, when for very long time my philosophy has been a withdrawalist one, which in practice can be exemplified by the following:

  • If they want to take your house away, burn it.
  • If they come to plunder your fields, torch the crops.
  • If they arrive looking for your gold, dump it all in the ocean.
  • If they think you need them, walk away.
  • If they assume that you depend on their services, and are at their mercy, close the account.
  • If they think you worry about your credit rating, skip payments for a couple of months.
  • If they think you will do anything to keep your job, quit.

One could think of many other examples — and unfortunately it can be tragic as well, as in the case of African slaves committing suicide, or murdering their newborns to keep them out of the hands of the slave owners. Perhaps this is why, to my knowledge, this is not clearly articulated as a political philosophy in the West (whatever West may be, but we all have an intuitive, working notion of what it might be) — it is a slave ideology. It has no prominent theorist. Unless, of course, we lump in “civil disobedience” as a form of withdrawalism, and then we at least have Gandhi and perhaps Martin Luther King Jr. If we extend it to relations between nations in the global market, then this ideology can take the form of autarky, and autarky has few if any examples of having ever existed, or having existed and inspiring a following. So I am in trouble, and it’s no wonder that for very long I tended to suppress this thinking and maintain it at a barely conscious level. I like it, but then again, I don’t live by it, not always, and I am not even sure I like it now. What I don’t want is a reputation for being the man who preaches “early withdrawal.” That would be premature.

At this stage, I am out of energy and will not comment on details or arguments, but rather just list the items I have come across of relevance to anthropology and the Human Terrain System:

Please feel free to read these, and get depressed.

Categories: COLONIALISM/IMPERIALISM · ETHNOGRAPHY · POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ACADEMIA
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

American Anthropology & the Pentagon: Let’s Professionalize “Terrorism” Research (1.6)

May 28, 2008 · 1 Comment

Despite what initially seemed to be a flurry of protests against the involvement of anthropologists in the Pentagon’s Human Terrain System, and more recent criticisms of the Pentagon taking a very large lead in funding social science research that would be of relevance to “terrorism” and “national security,” there seems to be a quiet, professional accommodation that is start to set in between all parties, even before waiting to see what kinds of directives a new administration in Washington might impose on the Pentagon itself (perhaps the Pentagon already knows there will be no changes?).

In today’s Inside Higher Ed, Scott Jaschik reports, “Pentagon officials are talking with the National Science Foundation about the NSF playing a major role in the peer review for a new program to promote social science research on topics that relate to key issues in U.S. foreign policy.” Perhaps it is significant that a military agency would actually “submit” to civilian influence, especially when American politics have become seriously militarized, when the military uniform has become fetishized, and where the principle that in a democracy civilians command the military and not vice versa has been seriously eroded. Of course what this report does not tell us is the extent to which the scholars performing the reviews are to be independent-minded, the kinds who can see through “terrorism” research, the kinds who won’t be swayed from having been born and raised in the cultural milieu of a nation that has known permanent war for two centuries and where “fear of the Other” is arguably the single most compelling and unifying national ideology.

Given that anthropology has a lengthening history of being deeply imbricated with colonialism, then finding ways to make “terror” research professional, to institutionalize it, and to even seek military funding to carry it out will do more than to just nail shut the coffin of anthropology, for good, among the discipline’s prospective new human fodder in other parts of the world. It will heap mounds of dirt on top of it. There have been too many “compromises” for these to be seen as incidental hiccups or momentary lapses of judgment. Instead it is more likely that these continuous “episodes” reflect the deep structure of what has been colonialism’s favourite discipline. From consultancies performed for the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, to counterinsurgency and terrorism research, this discipline risks losing any credibility it might have gained in the 1970s and 1980s with the rise of anti-imperialist literature from within its ranks.

The American Anthropological Association worries whether this national security research, as currently housed in the Pentagon, can live up to professional standards of peer review. Absent is any questioning of why there ought to be any “terrorism” research whatsoever — indeed a letter from AAA President Setha Low to the U.S. Office of Budget and Management states very simply: “We believe that it is of paramount importance for anthropologists to study the roots of terrorism.” In the place of critique, the AAA offers a call for, “rigorous, balanced and objective peer review” — objective, as if there is any objectivity left when discussing colour-coded mass hysteria. The AAA seems to be content with retreating to the ground of peer review, with maintaining the integrity of professional standards. The Pentagon’s “Minerva Consortia” otherwise meets with little challenge, apart from the Network of Concerned Anthropologists, which recently published its “concerns” about the Department of Defense’s “Minerva Project.”

Less concerned is the Defense Department, as in the case of the “senior official” who spoke to Scott Jaschik:

when the program is finalized, it will attract strong support from scholars, and predicted that “world class” professors would be involved. But he added that he wasn’t certain that the Pentagon would worry about satisfying disciplinary associations. “We certainly need qualified anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, historians, psychologists,” he said. “We need recognized experts in these fields. The relevant disciplines need to be involved. Whether professional associations per se should have a role, I’m less sure.”

And he or she is right to be “less concerned,” given the success of the powers that be in effectively instrumentalizing the American academy as a conduit for national security research. In fact, the AAA and the National Science Foundation promise to routinize it, to add respectability to the process, to encase it in professional standards. This is in part evidenced by other elements of the AAA website that appear at the same time as Setha Low’s letter: the announcement of the Director of National Intelligence’s “Open Source Conference,” and a rather weak statement from the Society for Applied Anthropology expressing its “concern” about the “potential” ethical “implications” of anthropologists becoming involved in the Human Terrain System. For all the funky articles one finds littering gracing the pages of the American Ethnologist and Cultural Anthropology, it turns out that American anthropologists are not so advanced where critique is concerned after all. Perhaps it is the case that they are better at “critiquing” other cultures and other societies and institutions more than themselves, just as they are better at theorizing change among target populations at the same time as they themselves actively resist changing the system in which they work.

One can expect to see the American Anthropological Association, and many of its members, continue to find ways to “adjust” to these realities, to make pragmatic compromises, and to look for avenues of influence (and not to lose out on any cash windfall, especially at a time when the economy is entering a long-term nose dive that will eventually visit major new funding cuts on universities and anthropology departments). The question that remains for the rest of us, outside of American anthropology, is how we should relate to American anthropology.

I do not maintain high hopes for any position taken by the Canadian Anthropology Society to have a major impact, as it is still a comparatively small organization and has limited public clout, from what I can gather. Its main activities today consist of producing an annual conference, and a biannual journal. It does not have its own code of ethics, for many different reasons, and only recently it has started up a newsletter. I think the onus will lie on anthropologists outside of Europe and North America, and especially the peoples studied by anthropologists, to revise or continue to revise their prospective working relationships with American anthropologists. More people need to be made aware of the kinds of compromises being worked out, and how this could affect them if they should choose to work with anthropologists.

To the extent that one continues to see the American Anthropological Association and many of its members offer continued accommodation with militarization, ranging from outright silence to the search for means of effective collaboration, the rest of us need to rethink our options. On either an individual or collective level we might consider redirecting our publications toward outlets other than American ones. We should also consider the extent, if any, to which the AAA occupies a hegemonic position in worldwide anthropology, and how its decisions could affect anthropology beyond American borders. At the end of the day however, I believe that professional associations can be expected to do very little critical political work, and some like the Canadian Anthropology Society have not been able to do much. A professional association is first of all obligated to defend a profession, and that can be done in myriad ways that cannot easily be aligned with any one political interest.

Perhaps my continued mistake is my assuming that, whatever we might do, that we can shore up the credibility and integrity of anthropology in the eyes of publics in current colonial situations — after all, many of these discussions have occurred in public and are recorded on the Internet, and I know that our discussions have not remained just among ourselves. The real question then would become not whether institutionalized anthropology will disappear, but rather how quickly some will force its exit.

Categories: COLLABORATION · COLONIALISM/IMPERIALISM · POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ACADEMIA
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The United States’ Colonial Armed Forces: “Un-American” Troops? (1.2)

May 26, 2008 · 1 Comment


Vietnamese French Foreign Legionnaire
It has long been the contention of Immanuel Wallerstein, among others, that one of the cost-effective ways of maintaining an empire is to get the colonized to colonize themselves. That is obviously a simple rendition of a long history. Yet let us note that the British Empire engaged in warfare with the help of the various West India Regiments that have existed, later becoming the Caribbean Regiment, the Corps of Colonial Marines, the King’s African Rifles, and the famous Nepalese Brigade of Gurkhas. The French had their Foreign Legion (the first Vietnamese man I ever met in life was an active duty French Foreign Legionnaire, in the photo at left). And now the United States has Latin American and Caribbean persons comprising almost half of all the foreign-born forces. Having an army peopled by troops from the colonies is a common historical feature of modern imperialism. We also know of the many American Indians who join the U.S. military, perhaps one of the reasons why early on there was an almost unanimous cheering of the invasion of Iraq from American Indian tribal governments. Indeed, apart from the American Indian Movement (AIM), which is not a tribal government, neither myself nor others were able to find exceptions when pressed to do so in a rather animated debate that took place on the world-systems discussion list.

GURKHAS2

KAR2

Gurkha brigade (top), King’s African Rifles (bottom)

Caribbean World News, reporting numbers provided by the Migration Policy Institute, notes that foreign-born military personnel from Latin America and the Caribbean together comprise 38.7% of all foreign-born U.S. military forces. Specifically, 3,064 are from Jamaica while 1,372 are from the Dominican Republic. In broader terms,

According to data from the Department of Defense, more than 65,000 immigrants were serving on active duty in the US Armed Forces as of February 2008 while since September 2001, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services has naturalized more than 37,250 foreign-born members of the US Armed Forces and granted posthumous citizenship to 111 service members.

As proportions of the overall branches in which they serve, foreign-born individuals comprise 22.9% of those serving in the army, 20.7% of everyone serving in the air force, and 15.5% of the US Marine Corps consists of foreign-born persons.

It is well known, at least among friends and acquaintances of mine in Trinidad, that one route to U.S. citizenship is not across the Mexican border, as shrill media commentators like to “remind” us, but rather the U.S. military. When American political leaders and media personalities engage in their familiar incantations — “support the troops,” “the troops are heroes,” and suggestions that a real American is one who “served his country,” one who “wore the uniform” — it is ironic that they themselves do not realize that they are praising the American-ness of a substantial number of non-Americans.

Categories: COLONIALISM/IMPERIALISM · POST-COLONIALISM
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fidel: Obama, the “Empire’s Hypocrite” (1.4)

May 26, 2008 · 3 Comments


Barack Obama Poster
Not all is cheerful on the Caribbean front for Senator Barack Obama, someone who has gained the public support, memorialized in reggae and calypso tunes (as featured on this blog), by some prominent artists in the region. Writing in Granma’s edition for Monday, 26 May, 2008, in a column titled, “The empire’s hypocritical politics” — a surprisingly short column considering the title which suggests a piece of encyclopedic proportions — Fidel Castro begins by saying: “it would be dishonest of me to remain silent after hearing the speech Obama delivered on the afternoon of May 23 at the Cuban American National Foundation created by Ronald Reagan.” Fidel quotes Obama as saying the following:

“Throughout my entire life, there has been injustice and repression in Cuba. Never, in my lifetime, have the people of Cuba known freedom. Never, in the lives of two generations of Cubans, have the people of Cuba known democracy. (…) This is the terrible and tragic status quo that we have known for half a century - of elections that are anything but free or fair (…) I won’t stand for this injustice, you won’t stand for this injustice, and together we will stand up for freedom in Cuba,” he told annexationists, adding: “It’s time to let Cuban American money make their families less dependent upon the Castro regime. (…) I will maintain the embargo.”

(The Cuban American National Foundation does not carry the text of Obama’s speech on its website.)

Fidel reports on an irony, in light of Hillary Clinton’s odd obsession with referencing Senator Robert Kennedy’s assassination in totally unrelated contexts, that Obama himself praised a man, Jose Hernandez, whose plans to assassinate Fidel himself in Venezuela were unmasked by authorities there. Given the furious outrage over any shadow of a comment that “something might happen” to Obama, it is interesting, but not by any means surprising, to see how utterly silent American public commentary is on the issue of murdering foreign heads of state, even when the prospective murderers are applauded by the likes of an Obama. When there is not silence, there is cheering, when even “The Daily Show” can make grotesque humour of the hanging of Saddam Hussein (one wonders how many lower halves of exploded US troops they featured in comical spoofs for Memorial Day).

Of course the other irony is that everything Obama stated could just as easily, or more easily, apply to China…which does not seem to be suffering from anything remotely resembling an embargo. Why does Obama fall into line so easily, and what sort of different candidate is he, to be exact?

Fidel sums up his reaction to the speech’s contents as follows:

“Presidential candidate Obama’s speech may be formulated as follows: hunger for the nation, remittances as charitable hand-outs and visits to Cuba as propaganda for consumerism and the unsustainable way of life behind it.”

In addition, Fidel poses a reasonable question to Obama, which is to explain how he thinks such terrible injustices could be perpetrated in Cuba for so long:

“No small and blockaded country like ours would have been able to hold its ground for so long on the basis of ambition, vanity, deceit or the abuse of power, the kind of power its neighbor has. To state otherwise is an insult to the intelligence of our heroic people.”

The rest of Fidel Castro’s commentary elaborates on the injustices perpetrated by the United States worldwide, without showering Obama with enmity. It is useful to have this sort of balance, when it is doubtful that, in terms of its global positioning, the United States will differ in any substantial manner under a President Obama. While promising a “phased” withdrawal from Iraq, Obama has promised renewed military action in Afghanistan. Why? Did Afghanistan attack the United States in 2001? Is Al Qaida based in Afghanistan? The same questions apply to a host of European nations, as well as Canada, which also have troops there.

Where are Obama’s stirring speeches against the use of torture, against the abusive detentions of hundreds of innocents in Guantanamo, of the countless violations of international treaties? When has Obama sought to educate his fellow citizens against maintaining imperial ambitions? When has Obama questioned why the U.S. is engaged in the world in the way it has been, why there is the automatic assumption that the U.S. must be ubiquitous like some god? Why has Obama not led his fellow citizens in questioning their right to tell anyone what to do and how to live? When has Obama questioned the U.S. approach in denying Iran’s international rights to nuclear energy? How has Obama proposed to pay compensation to millions of Iraqis, and to thousands of illegally detained persons? How does Obama propose to bring an end to NAFTA, which he seemed to criticize a few months ago?

If, however, Obama is “secretly” planning a serious transformation in the ways the U.S. engages in geopolitical dominance, then the problem that raises is that of votes acquired under false pretenses. That problem would be magnified given Obama’s insistence on courting votes from almost every sector imaginable, including the upper crust of Miami’s Cuban elites in this case. One does not, and ought not, play to every gallery in town when proposing radical changes. The resilient lack of fundamental questioning of U.S. imperial engagement, and the multiple masks and shields that have been politically instituted and culturally elaborated so as to make imperialism immune to the threat of such questioning, effectively render the U.S. a one-party state governed by decreasingly covert, and increasingly orthodox and defensive forms of totalitarianism. I still find it jarring to hear every leading candidate in the U.S. speak in terms of enemies, force, striking, leadership, and war — ultimately, this is the most consistent and distinctive feature of American domestic politics that contrasts violently with the political discourse to be found in most if not all other self-declared democracies. The U.S. has been in a permanent state of war since World War II*, and I have heard nothing from Obama that suggests an end is in sight.

(*This is a conservative statement: depending on some chronologies, such as this one, the U.S. has been engaged in warfare for over 200 years, almost constantly and with only very brief pauses.)

In terms of some stock American pathologies, shared by a number of American anthropologists who have no qualms about marching into Iraq and Afghanistan, armed and uniformed, “to do research to help people,” Obama is nothing new and offers no correctives and no example of inspiring difference. For someone who can so easily speak of the “marvelous” and “heroic” job done by U.S. troops in Iraq, this should serve as a chilling reminder that “change” in U.S. politics is often very superficial and sometimes the prelude to a new phase of imperial expansionism. Among those routinely singled out for representing a break with the pattern of America-the-brute, one can count John Kennedy (Vietnam, Bay of Pigs, Alliance for Progress), Jimmy Carter (El Salvador), and Bill Clinton (Desert Fox, Kosovo). Indeed, since World War II, and arguably for over 100 years, with the possible exception of Gerald Ford there has not been one single U.S. President who has not committed U.S. forces abroad or ordered military attacks against another nation. That is quite a track record, even for a rogue state, and nothing Obama has said promises any difference on this score. Hypocrisy is not so interesting by itself, were it not for the fact that one can use it to point to the presence of orthodoxy, since hypocrisy is an almost universal feature of all orthodoxies.

Categories: Barack Obama · COLONIALISM/IMPERIALISM · POST-COLONIALISM
Tagged: , , , , ,

Revolution (3 Canal): “This land is ‘mines’ “

May 26, 2008 · 1 Comment

Another of my favourite Rapso pieces from 3-Canal, a visually very attractive video in my eyes, one that manages to bring out the revolutionary shades of the Trinidadian flag itself, in an act of reinterpretation. The last quarter of the video, showing the singers and dancers splashed in black oil, paint, and beating biscuit tins is a fairly good representation of what one would see during J’Ouvert street celebrations at the dawn of Carnival in Trinidad. If Soca has been associated with Carnival, then one might argue that 3-Canal is a J’Ouvert music band given its consistent use of J’Ouvert imagery. J’Ouvert is arguably the last, largely non-commercial, non-competitive, free, open, even home-spun activity of the Carnival season. Costumes are improvised, humorous messages quickly painted on placards, little acts performed in the street, with a deep plunge into otherness in the depths of the night — it’s in J’Ouvert that Carib breweries might throw a few dollars at a small band called Taliban, giving us “Carib Taliban,” a name loaded with cannibalism, terrorism, and beer. In J’Ouvert, everybody “loses it” for a good while, Trinidadians and foreign visitors alike, brought on by a mixture of trance, drunkenness, heat exhaustion, arousal. It’s great to be part of a pulsating throng of dark silhouettes in chaos moving through the streets of Port of Spain at night, getting a spiritual sense that anything could happen, that the world has fallen away, that something new could come. No wonder that 3-Canal’s cutting lyrics are accompanied by this J’Ouvert ethos. Enjoy the video — I know you will be back to see it again when three days from now you find yourself humming it without any provocation.


Categories: DECOLONIZATION · LIBERATION · Monday Morning Madness · RESURGENCE · UTOPISTICS
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Restoration: More Indigenous than the Ancestors, in the Poet’s Eye

May 26, 2008 · No Comments

I was struck by this passage from Derek Walcott’s acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1992. I had read this at the time it was released and had forgotten this passage until I accidentally found it again in the last few weeks.

Break a vase, and the love that reassembles the fragments is stronger than that love which took its symmetry for granted when it was whole. The glue that fits the pieces is the sealing of its original shape. It is such a love that reassembles our African and Asiatic fragments, the cracked heirlooms whose restoration shows its white scars. This gathering of broken pieces is the care and pain of the Antilles, and if the pieces are disparate, ill-fitting, they contain more pain than their original sculpture, those icons and sacred vessels taken for granted in their ancestral places. Antillean art is this restoration of our shattered histories, our shards of vocabulary, our archipelago becoming a synonym for pieces broken off from the original continent.

The love that goes into restoration is even stronger than the love which took reality for granted. In the vision of the poet, what some have called the “Taino restoration” brings us face to face with people who are more firmly committed, attentive, and protective of indigenous heritage than even the ancestors that they take care to respect — what a refreshing difference from scornful remarks about the “neo-Taino” as mere “wannabes” who are not “real,” not “real” like “real Indians of the past.” I take it that “white scars” can have multiple meanings here: a direct reference to glue, thus of binding, and healing; the sea, uniting Caribbean islands, these fragments of the mainland; and/or, the history of colonialism, white domination, that wrought the breakage to begin with. And finally the poem places the Antilles within a South American embrace, now bringing together the poet with the archaeologist while reminding a region of a history that is too often forgotten, willfully even.

Categories: POST-COLONIALISM · RESURGENCE
Tagged: , , ,

Project Updates (2.0)

May 22, 2008 · No Comments

Version 1.4 of the Open Anthropology project description is now available. Click on “About the Project” above if interested.

I am currently working on chapters for Indigenous Cosmopolitans and the Who Is An Indian? volumes. I am also embarking on a complete redesign and restructuring of the Caribbean Amerindian Centrelink, relocating it  to WordPress in fact, so that it can be easier to manage and update, and can be transferred to indigenous hands without any technical or financial impediments.

I realize I am leaving out a lot here — further evidence that there is no rest for the wicked. On the other hand we are told that idle hands are the devil’s tools, so I am not sure if to work or rest.

Categories: "OUT THERE"
Tagged:

KOBO•TOWN: The Promise of Independence

May 21, 2008 · 1 Comment

SING OUT, SHOUT OUT


forty years ago today
independence came our way
welcomed by our struggling songs
it came but would not stay
and we, wanting to believe,
let ourselves be deceived
by the well-groomed speech of ambitious men
who time proved to be thieves
but the years went by and nothing came
new flag, new name, same old game
where the lucky laugh and the poor endure
having lost the will to fight again

Chorus
I remember when we were young
and hope was strong
and we had waited long
to hear the midnight bell
that would dispel
the age that kept us down
I recall when we would bleed
’cause we believed
freedom was in reach
of those who seized the day
but freedom came and faded like a dream

children of a passing age
remnants of a dying rage
whose anthems swept across this land
proclaiming a new day
and we waited patiently
for the elusive decree
that would rub away the scars we bore
and set our voices free
but the years wore on and nothing came
tyrants just bore different names
while the official line promised brighter times
we knew all things remained the same

independence, what an elusive dream
things are never ever what they seem
marchin’ hand in hand awaitin’ the command
of the liberator, soon to be the henchman
people’s vanguard, propaganda ministry
freedom fighters fillin’ the ranks of the secret police
while the tale on the times told in obituary lines
we offer our resistance with these humble rhymes

sing out, shout out, the dream never dies….

Speeches: Jawarhalal Nehru, August 15th, 1947, On India’s Independence; Milton Obote, October 9th, 1962, On the Independence of Uganda; Winston Churchill, June 18th, 1940, Address to House of Commons


Categories: "NOTES & QUOTES" · COLONIALISM/IMPERIALISM · MANIFESTO · POST-COLONIALISM
Tagged: , , , , , , ,